The build-out of Paragon's software into a full-stack application. This page is the always-current map of where the project stands. Direction will change frequently as design and prototyping proceed.
The project originates in the 19 June 2026 discussion on no-code versus owned full-stack. As of the 24 June design session it is in an R&D / prototyping phase within the existing budget — no new fees or subscriptions.
The working direction is firming — database-centric, AI-central, reduced role rigidity, a questionnaire-centric document model (see below) — but no formal decision has been made. The plan is to see what the prototypes look like over the next month or two, then decide whether to continue. The current no-code portal stays in production throughout.
Next.js (front end) + Supabase (database) + Vercel (deployment). Code in GitHub, owned by Paragon (no data stored in GitHub). TypeScript throughout.
Google Vertex AI as the PII-safe "walled garden" (pending confirmation it is GDPR-sufficient and multimodal). AI targeted at specific steps, not an AI-orchestrated system — most workflows are deterministic automations, with agents only on the periphery.
Spec-driven AI development: architectural decisions and specs first, then agent execution, with full-stack ownership of the code. Small team led by Joel.
Reuse the existing data model (port via Noloco's GraphQL API + Airtable export); replicate current functionality first to reach a working system fast, then reimagine selected document workflows. Tradeoff: replicate-first reaches a working system quickly; reimagining is deferred to selected workflows rather than attempted all at once.
Reduce the rigid per-document uploader / reviewer / approver model — any team member can act within clear boundaries; keep history without hard-enforcing it; allow a client to assume the grantee role, and multiple grantee-side people to access the questionnaire.
A PII-protected layer (Vertex AI) over the whole project that surfaces red flags across grantee and team answers and uploaded documents, reviews governance documents and local law, and can run live local-law research.
No formal decisions yet. The items above are working direction, not commitments.